Rodger Wireless http://www.rodger.nl/en/products/betwetting-alarm-system.html (June 23, 2013)
As we have previously stated, we prefer to examine the manufacturer's website for what they say and explain about their bedwetting alarm. Rodger's home site is very incomplete. Although they explain the essence of their alarms, most of the physical details (size, weight) are missing. As are clear statements about what they provide and the performance of their system. For example, Rodger mentions that their receiver can use 2 AA batteries. Are these batteries provided?
Deceit by Concealment.
This Rodger site is extra-ordinarily brief. There are many unanswered questions in our mind, and we must give their site a poor rating because of the lack of information. We must give them credit for not making extravagant or extraordinary claims, which is a plus when compared to the self-inflation of some of the other bedwetting alarm manufacturers.
Deceit by Concealment.
Because of the unusually brief nature of Rodger's web site, we are taking an exceptional liberty of looking at the site of their major reseller in the U.S. at
This site fills in many details that the Rodger site does not mention.
The site states that "A second receiver is especially important for larger homes or if your child sleeps on a different floor." Another statement that "The maximum range of the system is approximately 75 feet" suggests that the receivers are purely receivers, and do not have the ability to retransmit the signal to extend the transmission range of the alarm. So all receivers must be within this specified range of the transmitter. Please make this clear. Deceit by concealment.
The question raised earlier about whether the two AA batteries are provided is still unclear. Deceit by Concealment.
Another statement "Regular underwear/briefs are not required" suggests that regular underwear could be used. This is not so. This alarm works only with the special wired briefs. Why not explicitly state this? Deceit by Concealment.
We recognize that the loudness of the receiver's alarm sound varies with distance from the ear. As this receiver is commonly plugged into a wall electric socket, users should be interested in the loudness at some sample distances. This is deceit by concealment.
Again, we are glad that this site abstains from typical advertising hype or making claims that this is the "Best" alarm. Thank you. Overall, we appreciate the information and its completeness in the second site.
A detailed comparison of Rodger wireless to other wireless bedwetting alarms can be found at http://www.urinealarms.com/Wireless_Alarm_Chart.html .
A detailed comparison of Rodger wireless to other wireless bedwetting alarms can be found at http://www.urinealarms.com/Wireless_Alarm_Chart.html .
Some Deceit by Concealment.
No comments:
Post a Comment